CONTENTS
- Rapid Reference 🚀
- Core agents
- Peripheral vasopressors
- Midodrine
- Refractory shock ➡️
- Podcast
- Questions & discussion
- Pitfalls
classic inodilators (milrinone, dobutamine)
- Mechanism
- Dobutamine stimulates mostly beta-receptors, with very little stimulation of alpha-receptors.
- Milrinone inhibits intracellular adenylyl cyclase, thereby increasing intracellular cyclic AMP levels.
- Physiologic effect
- Primary effect is positive inotropy, with positive chronotropy as well.
- Secondary effect is peripheral vasodilation.
- Cardiac output is increased due to both inotropic effect and vasodilation.
- Effect on blood pressure is variable, depending on how responsive the heart is to inotropy. If the heart responds strongly (with increased stroke volume and heart rate), it is possible for these drugs to increase blood pressure. However, if the heart is already working as hard as it can, then the vasodilator effect may be dominant, causing a drop in blood pressure. Overall, the effect on blood pressure is unpredictable.
- Clinical use
- (1) Low-output cardiogenic shock. Care is required for patients with hypotension, since there is a risk of exacerbating hypotension.
- (2) Septic shock with inadequate cardiac output (as an add-on agent). However, epinephrine could be a superior choice in that situation, if blood pressure is tenuous.
- How to titrate
- Ideally, the inodilators should be titrated against cardiac output or a surrogate of cardiac output (e.g. urine output).
- They shouldn't be titrated against blood pressure, because they have no predictable effect on blood pressure.
- Pro/con of different agents?
- Milrinone causes a bit more vasodilation, so it might be better for cardiogenic shock. However, milrinone is renally eliminated, which can make it difficult to titrate in patients with renal failure.
- Dobutamine is easier to titrate due to its short half-life, so it is often a preferred agent if the patient's response to inotropy isn't entirely predictable.
- Prolonged infusion of dobutamine may cause desensitization of beta-receptors and reduced efficacy. This may be a problem, but it can also help wean the patient off dobutamine once the infusion has been running for a long time (it may be easier to wean off than would be expected).
isoproterenol
- Mechanism: Pure beta-agonist.
- Physiologic effect: Very powerful chronotrope, with positive inotropic effects as well.
- Clinical use: Bradycardia (will work in some patients who are refractory to epinephrine).
- How to titrate: typically, against heart rate.
- Pro/Con?
- Isoproterenol is probably the most powerful chronotrope.
- It doesn't cause vasoconstriction, so it's safe to give peripherally.
- Its main drawback is pricing & availability: in the United States the price is astronomical and some hospitals don't have it. If you don't have it, epinephrine can usually be used as an alternative agent.
vasopressin
- Mechanism: Stimulates V1 and V2 receptors, causing vasoconstriction and renal water retention.
- Physiologic effects:
- It increases systemic vascular resistance (SVR).
- It does cause venoconstriction, which may increase preload.
- Its dominant effect on cardiac output is often to cause a reduction (but this may depend on the heart's ability to tolerate increased afterload).
- Clinical use:
- Vasodilatory shock (particularly sepsis). Typically given in low doses (0-0.06 U/min), either as primary or secondary agent.(27483065)
- Front-line agent for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) in countries lacking terlipressin (such as the United States).
- Central diabetes insipidus (only very low doses are needed, e.g. 0.01 units/minute or less).
- Variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage (theoretically an attractive agent, but pragmatically it's impossible to titrate adequately).
- How to titrate: typically, against blood pressure.
- Pro/Con
- Vasopressin may preferentially cause vasoconstriction of post-glomerular arterioles in the kidney, causing improvement in renal function.
- It may cause some pulmonary vasodilation, which can be helpful in the context of pulmonary hypertension.
- Vasopressin shouldn't generally be given peripherally (if it extravasates, there is no antidote).
- Vasopressin can cause digital ischemia, especially when combined with norepinephrine – must pay careful attention to perfusion of hands and feet; shut off vasopressin at first sign of ischemic digits.
phenylephrine
- Mechanism: Pure alpha-agonist, causes arterial and venous vasoconstriction.
- Physiologic effect
- Increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR).
- Venoconstriction increases the preload.
- Effect on cardiac output depends on preload-responsiveness versus ability of the heart to handle increased afterload. For example, in a patient with systolic heart failure and volume overload, added preload won't help, whereas the heart may be unable to tolerate afterload – so the net effect is to reduce the cardiac output. Alternatively, for a patient who is preload-responsive with a stronger ejection fraction, phenylephrine could cause a net increase in cardiac output.
- Available evidence in sepsis suggests that phenylephrine has a very similar physiologic effect compared to norepinephrine.🌊 Both agents are predominantly alpha-agonists.
- Phenylephrine can cause a mild reflex bradycardia due to elevation in blood pressure.
- Clinical use:
- Vasodilatory shock.
- Useful in patients with critical aortic stenosis (who have a fixed afterload imposed on the left ventricle by the stenotic valve).
- Atrial fibrillation with fast ventricular response (increases blood pressure while causing reflex reduction in heart rate).
- How to titrate: typically, against blood pressure.
- Pro/Con
- It has classically been feared that phenylephrine would drop the cardiac output. This seems to occur with phenylephrine boluses, but not with infusions (available evidence indicates that a phenylephrine infusion functions pretty similarly compared to a norepinephrine infusion).
- It is safe to give peripherally.
- Phenylephrine is about ten times less potent than norepinephrine (i.e. 10 mcg/min phenylephrine is roughly equivalent to 1 mcg/min norepinephrine). Phenylephrine is generally supplied as a fairly dilute solution, which can make this logistically problematic for patients requiring high-dose vasoconstriction. Thus, phenylephrine monotherapy is largely restricted to patients with mild to moderate vasodilatory shock due to logistic constraints.
norepinephrine
- Mechanism: Predominantly an alpha-agonist, with some beta-agonism as well.
- Physiology
- Increases systemic vascular resistance (SVR), causes venoconstriction (increasing preload), and has an inotropic/chronotropic effect.
- Increases blood pressure and may increase urine output.
- Tends to cause cardiac output to increase or remain stable (depending on how responsive the heart is to preload, afterload, and inotropy).
- Clinical use
- Widely popular first-line agent for a variety of shock states (septic shock, cardiogenic shock with severe hypotension).
- Good “broad spectrum” vasoactive agent when it's unclear precisely what is going on.
- How to titrate:
- Typically, against blood pressure.
- There is no “maximal dose” of norepinephrine.🌊
- Pro/Con
- Strong track record in septic and cardiogenic shock.
epinephrine
- Mechanism: At lower doses the beta-agonist effects may predominate; with ongoing up-titration there are increasing alpha-agonist effects as well.
- Physiology
- Causes chronotropy and inotropy, thereby increasing the cardiac output.
- Increases systemic vascular resistance and also causes venoconstriction (increasing preload).
- Stabilizes mast cells, blocking the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.
- Beta-2 agonist stimulation causes bronchodilation, decreases potassium levels, and stimulates the generation of aerobic lactate production by the liver. This is often feared, but lactate may be used as a metabolic fuel by the heart, so this mechanism of action is probably beneficial (in the absence of profound pre-existing metabolic acidosis).🌊
- Clinical uses
- (1) Bradycardia and bradycardic shock (given inotropic effects).
- (2) Septic shock (shown in the 🐱CAT trial to be an adequate alternative to norepinephrine).(18654759) It seems to work especially well in patients with inappropriately low heart rate and/or low cardiac output, who likely have a poor sympathetic response to sepsis.🌊
- (3) At low doses (below 5-10 mcg/kg/min), the predominant effect is as an inotrope, so it can be used for patients with low-output cardiogenic shock. Compared to dobutamine/milrinone, low-dose epinephrine has a touch of alpha-activity which will tend to prevent hypotension.
- (4) Push-dose epinephrine is useful for patients crashing from a variety of causes (e.g. bradycardic peri-arrest). Epinephrine is generally a good choice for the nearly-dead patient.🌊
- (5) First-line agent for anaphylaxis. Note that epinephrine may be indicated for treatment for anaphylaxis even if the hemodynamics are stable.📖
- How to titrate: depends on clinical application.
- Pro/Con
- Epinephrine is a powerful drug with established efficacy in sepsis, also useful in bradycardia and cardiogenic shock.
- The main concern is that at high doses for long periods of time, it may promote a stress cardiomyopathy.
- It causes lactate production which isn't dangerous (may be physiologically beneficial).🌊 However, practitioners must be aware of this issue; otherwise they may senselessly chase lactate values.
- Epinephrine causes a small decrease in potassium, which is generally not a problem. Effects on potassium may be useful in patients with hyperkalemia and bradycardia (e.g., BRASH syndrome 📖).
dopamine
- Mechanism/physiology
- Dopamine hits a variety of receptors at different dose ranges (“dirty” drug).
- It's often difficult to figure out what it is doing to your patient. For example, low-dose dopamine can actually cause hypotension (due to a predominant effect of vasodilation), which can make it difficult to wean off the dopamine.
- Reasons dopamine should be abandoned:
- Dopamine increases mortality in RCTs: Dopamine increased mortality compared to norepinephrine in the subgroup of patients with cardiogenic shock.(20200382) It also increased mortality compared to epinephrine among septic children.(26323041)
- It's often impossible to figure out what dopamine is doing (given the variety of different effects at different doses in different patients). This makes it impossible to titrate in any rational fashion (up-titration may cause dopamine to function via a different mechanism entirely).
- Dopamine has unique adverse endocrine effects.
- Dopamine may directly stimulate diuresis via action on dopamine-receptors, thereby falsely suggesting that renal perfusion is adequate.
- There is a relatively high risk of tissue necrosis if it extravasates.
- Better agents exist: there is nothing dopamine does that can't be achieved with the use of norepinephrine and/or epinephrine.
- Dopamine may cause greater malperfusion of the gut compared to norepinephrine.
peripheral IV line
- Hemodynamic stabilization should never wait until central access is obtained. Thus, peripheral vasopressors should be started immediately if the blood pressure or perfusion is inadequate.
- Norepinephrine is safe for short periods of time through a large peripheral vein. Ongoing peripheral infusion also appears safe, but this should ideally be done within the context of a well-designed protocol involving frequent monitoring of the extremity and preparation for management of extravasation reaction.🌊 Ongoing infusion should be avoided in deep ultrasound-guided peripheral IVs, where it may be impossible to monitor the tissue surrounding the end of the IV cannula.
- Phenylephrine and epinephrine have not been reported to cause tissue necrosis. Peripheral infusion of these agents appears to be generally safe, although this should still ideally be done via a well-functioning cannula proximal to the wrist.🌊
- Vasopressin should arguably be avoided for peripheral administration, because if it extravasates there is no vasodilatory agent which can counteract its action.
midline catheter
- These are catheters placed in the arm, similar to a PICC, but shorter (typically 10-20 cm in length, terminating before the shoulder).
- Clinician-placed midlines are evolving as an alternative to either ultrasound-guided peripheral IVs or central lines.
- This is a rapidly emerging topic. Overall, vasopressor administration via midline catheters appears to be safe.🌊
basics
- Oral alpha-1 agonist, which acts as a pure vasopressor.
more common clinical indications in critical care:
- Cirrhosis & hepatorenal syndrome
- Midodrine is a component of oral therapy for hepatorenal syndrome.
- Some evidence suggests that ongoing midodrine therapy in patients with cirrhosis may support renal perfusion (given that these patients suffer from chronic vasodilation).
- 🛑 Accelerated weaning from vasopressors
- ⚠️ The MIDAS trial suggests that midodrine is not effective at accelerating the weaning off IV vasopressors among most ICU patients.🌊 (32885276)
- ⚠️ Currently, best available evidence indicates that midodrine should not be used to hasten weaning off vasopressor infusions among non-cirrhotic patients.
dose
- The usual starting dose is 10 mg PO q8hr. Make sure the drug is dosed q8hr and not “three times daily with meals,” which is what the computer may default to.
- Dose range is 5-40 mg q8hr.(26953217)
- Midodrine is cleared by the kidney, so exercise caution in renal dysfunction.
contraindications/cautions
- Reflex bradycardia can occur.
Follow us on iTunes
The Podcast Episode
Want to Download the Episode?
Right Click Here and Choose Save-As
To keep this page small and fast, questions & discussion about this post can be found on another page here.
- Any use of dopamine (there are better agents).
- Failure to aggressively up- and down-titrate vasopressors to determine the physiologic effect of each on any specific patient. Medications may not behave as described in a textbook (even this book!). By continually adjusting infusion rates, it is often possible to get a sense of which agents are most effective. The goal is always to use the minimal total dose of vasopressors necessary to achieve hemodynamic targets, so if a drug doesn't seem to be having any effect then wean it off.
- Ongoing infusion of vasopressin despite evidence of malperfused digits.
- Excess use of vasopressors (especially the combination of norepinephrine and vasopressin), which can lead to a phenomenon of iatrogenic vasoconstrictive shock in patients with poor cardiac function (wherein excessive vasoconstriction causes a drop in cardiac output, causing low cardiac output and shock). Beware of this phenomenon. When encountered, consider the addition of epinephrine and down-titration of vasoconstrictors.
- Use of agents with beta-agonist activity in patients with atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular response.
- Failure to up-titrate norepinephrine beyond arbitrary “upper limits” imposed by hospitals or local culture (there is actually no upper limit on the norepinephrine dose).
- Fear of using epinephrine due to concerns that it may increase the lactate (increased lactate levels due to epinephrine are probably beneficial in most cases).
- Delaying vasopressor initiation until central access is obtained (instead, peripheral vasopressor infusion should be used to immediately stabilize the patient).
Guide to emoji hyperlinks ![🔗](https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f517.svg)
= Link to online calculator.
= Link to Medscape monograph about a drug.
= Link to IBCC section about a drug.
= Link to IBCC section covering that topic.
= Link to FOAMed site with related information.
= Link to supplemental media.
Going further
- Pressor overview
- Pure pressors
- Epinephrine & lactate
- Titration & selection issues
- Peripheral pressors & midlines
- Peripheral pressors (EMCrit RACC 107)
- Are peripheral vasopressors safe (Salim Rezaie, RebelCast)
- Phenylephrine & epinephrine can be infused peripherally
- Midlines: EMCrit RACC part 1 & part 2.
- Vasopressin
References
- 14707556 López A, Lorente JA, Steingrub J, Bakker J, McLuckie A, Willatts S, Brockway M, Anzueto A, Holzapfel L, Breen D, Silverman MS, Takala J, Donaldson J, Arneson C, Grove G, Grossman S, Grover R. Multiple-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 546C88: effect on survival in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000105581.01815.C6 [PubMed]
- 18654759 Myburgh JA, Higgins A, Jovanovska A, Lipman J, Ramakrishnan N, Santamaria J; CAT Study investigators. A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2226-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1219-0 [PubMed]
- 20200382 De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118 [PubMed]
- 26323041 Ventura AM, Shieh HH, Bousso A, Góes PF, de Cássia F O Fernandes I, de Souza DC, Paulo RL, Chagas F, Gilio AE. Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2292-302. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001260 [PubMed]
- 26953217 Whitson MR, Mo E, Nabi T, Healy L, Koenig S, Narasimhan M, Mayo PH. Feasibility, Utility, and Safety of Midodrine During Recovery Phase From Septic Shock. Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1380-3. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.657 [PubMed]
- 27483065 Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N, Perkins GD, Cecconi M, Cepkova M, Pogson DG, Aya HD, Anjum A, Frazier GJ, Santhakumaran S, Ashby D, Brett SJ; VANISH Investigators. Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):509-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10485 [PubMed]
- 28840449 Tucker D, Lu Y, Zhang Q. From Mitochondrial Function to Neuroprotection-an Emerging Role for Methylene Blue. Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Jun;55(6):5137-5153. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0712-2 [PubMed]
- 32885276 Santer P, Anstey MH, Patrocínio MD, Wibrow B, Teja B, Shay D, Shaefi S, Parsons CS, Houle TT, Eikermann M; MIDAS Study Group. Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1884-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06216-x [PubMed]