Based on Master Nickson's comments on the PE debate, you could argue this would be an acceptable paradigm. Using Wells as your entry forces gestalt into the equation. Since Wells' low risk arguably gets you somewhere between 1-6% in ED populations, PERC should be acceptable.
Clinical Guidelines from ACP include intermediate d-dimers, age-adjusted d-dimer (Ann Intern Med 2015;163:701)
Likely pretest prob patients are ruled out by neg CTA (Safety of multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with a likely pretest clinical probability. J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 2. doi: 10.1111/jth.13746.)
Normalization of Vital Signs does not reduce probability of PE (https://coreem.net/journal-reviews/vs-normalization/)
Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)
- EMCrit Podcast 210 – Arterial Lines (Part 1) - October 16, 2017
- EMCrit Wee – Dissemination and Information Transfer (Questions not Answers) - October 11, 2017
- EMCrit Podcast 209 – GTD Redux – Opportunities, Time, & Future Selves - October 2, 2017