Cite this post as:
Scott Weingart, MD FCCM. Expert Commentary on EMCrit. EMCrit Blog. Published on July 6, 2014. Accessed on June 10th 2023. Available at [https://emcrit.org/emcrit/expert-commentary/ ].
Financial Disclosures:
Dr. Scott Weingart, Course Director, reports no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
This episode’s speaker(s), (listed above), report no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
CME Review
Original Release: July 6, 2014
Date of Most Recent Review: Jan 1, 2022
Termination Date: Jan 1, 2025
You finished the 'cast,
Now Join EMCrit!
As a member, you can...
- Get CME hours
- Get the On Deeper Reflection Podcast
- Support the show
- Write it off on your taxes or get reimbursed by your department
.
Get the EMCrit Newsletter
If you enjoyed this post, you will almost certainly enjoy our others. Subscribe to our email list to keep informed on all of the Resuscitation and Critical Care goodness.
This Post was by the EMCrit Crew, published 9 years ago. We never spam; we hate spammers! Spammers probably work for the Joint Commission.
good to hear. why dont you consider this a form of peer review?
the term is loaded by its associations with the prior, flawed paradigm. Instead of looking like we are capitulating to outdated forms; I want to move forward with what we are forging in the FOAM world.
I should also say, that some journals used to have expert commentary after the publication of major articles. J Trauma used to do it. It seems to have disappeared, but it was one thing that seemed to have worked.
its challenging since you have not defined what constitutes expert commentary..whereas peer review has precedence and tradition. Having done peer review for journals, I know what is expected and what it does. As for expert commentary..I think if this is to be an improvement on existing, then you need to define its parameters. I am having same issue with PHARM blog, having moved to a prepublication peer review process. Still trying to sort out balance of creative writing and academic comment/review ! I dont have the right answers yet but I think this general move is in right direction..and since… Read more »
Hi Scott:
Just an FYI, you’ll note that we actually use both pre- and post-publication peer review as detailed in the CJEM paper that is presently online and in press. It is, unfortunately, not open access because we can’t afford it. 🙁
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24742824
Thanks for blogging about your efforts and role modelling how we can all continue to contribute different methods for rigour to our teaching online!