Podcast 054 – Dr. Rivers on Severe Sepsis – Part I

August 29, 2011 by Scott Weingart 31 Comments

Part I of Dr. Rivers' talk on Severe Sepsis

Dr. Emanuel Rivers brought the concept of aggressive therapies for sepsis down to the Emergency Department with his seminal article on EGDT published in the NEJM in 2001. We were lucky enough to get an hour of his time to do a conference call with the NYC STOP Sepsis collaborative.

I broke the ~1 hour lecture into 3 parts. In Part I, Dr. Rivers discusses:

Prehospital Antibiotics
Comparison between the original EGDT Study and the Jones study (showing the non-inferiority of the non-invasive approach).
Alactemic Septic Shock

Find Part II and Part III for more fun

Here is a pdf of Dr. Rivers' Slides

Get a Free Trial of EM Critical Care Journal

Click Here for a 6 Month Free Trial of the New EMCC Journal

and now the Podcast…

Right Click Here for an Audio-Only Version

Video

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 24:00 — 60.9MB) | Embed

Author
Recent Posts

Scott Weingart

An ED Intensivist from NY. No conflicts of interest (coi).

Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)

EMCrit Wee – Stop Kneejerk Intubation with the EMCrit Crew - March 30, 2020
EMCrit Wee – Alternatives to Vent Splitting and the Safest Vent Splitting Methods in COVID19 - March 28, 2020
COVID Airway Management Thoughts - March 27, 2020

Cite this post as:

Scott Weingart. Podcast 054 – Dr. Rivers on Severe Sepsis – Part I. EMCrit Blog. Published on August 29, 2011. Accessed on March 31st 2020. Available at [https://emcrit.org/emcrit/rivers-sepsis-i/ ].

Financial Disclosures

Unless otherwise noted at the top of the post, the speaker(s) and related parties have no relevant financial disclosures.

You finished the 'cast,
Now get CME credit

Already an EMCrit CME Subscriber?
Click Here to Get CME Credit for the Episode

Not a subcriber yet? Why the heck not?
By subscribing, you can...

Get CME hours
Support the show
Write it off on your taxes or get reimbursed by your department

Subscribe Now

If you enjoyed this post, you will almost certainly enjoy our others. Subscribe to our email list to keep informed on all of the Resuscitation and Critical Care goodness.

This Post was by the EMCrit Crew, published 9 years ago. We never spam; we hate spammers! Spammers probably work for the Joint Commission.

31

Comment Here

newest oldest most voted

Dr. Emmanuel Rivers on Severe Sepsis – Part I « The Central Line

[…] [Click here to read more and to watch the podcast] […]

Guest

Brian

Any chance we can get an audio-only version. Thanks.

Author

Scott Weingart

it is now up

Guest

Muhammad Umer Shehzad

Hi Scott,
Any reason Rivers’s talk on sepsis is not downloadable as an “mp3” ?
Its in a mpeg4 movie format.
Regards and Salams

Guest

Minh Le Cong

Big thank you to Dr Rivers and yourself Scott for this podcast. It is excellent
with the aeromedical retrieval work we do in RFDS we use prehospital antibiotics a lot as transport times are long. So it’s not unheard of. But Dr Rivers raises a salient point that doing so can cause harm if inappropriately given.

Author

Scott Weingart

Absolutely

Guest

Brendon Smith

The EGDT trial always seems to be misrepresented. What is often ignored is that the control gr0up got very good care, and innovations to improve sepsis care are often about improving existing levels of care given to that given in the control group. The Australian experience in studies related to the ARISE trial showed that existing outcomes showed a mortality of under 25%, i.e. what was achieved by the EGDT protocol, despite the EGDT protocol not being used. The issue down here is how can EGDT improve on existing care? I’ve asked at many conferences, but no-one has been able to explain why the intervention group got more fluids than was given to the control group despite the treatment goals in the control group aiming for the same CVP and BP. The next step of EGDT to target HtCT and ScvO2 was only required in 15%. What directed increased fluids in the other 85% – was it based on ScvO2, or if not why didn’t the CVP and BP targets result in similar fluid volumes being given?

Author

Scott Weingart

Brendon,

The biggest difference between the two groups was one that was barely mentioned in the study publication: the EGDT arm had a specially trained resident come in from home and only deal with the one patient. This is probably why the EGDT arm got the fluids and aggressive therapies in the proper amount at the proper time. I have always considered the original paper to be proof of the value of ED crit care with dedicated staff more than anything else.

Guest

Muhammad Umer Shehzad

Thanks for the audio.
great post there.
Thanks to you for your great work Scott.
Keep the great work up.
Regards

Guest

Casey

HI Scott
One point confused me a bit – inappropriate vs appropriate antibiotics – it seemed like a bad thing to give the wrong ABs – increased mortality etc.
What is the definition for inappropriate antibiotics? Is it based on the empirical choice? Or have I misunderstood?
Casey

Author

Scott Weingart

In the context of these studies, appropriate refers to antibiotics that the eventually discovered bacteria was susceptible to and inappropriate refers to antibiotics that did not cover the bug. This is why sepsis antibiotic regimens have become broad enough to cover EVERY POSSIBLE bug, rather than adding on later.

Guest

Keng Sheng Chew

Thanks for the wonderful talk and the free downloads. I have posted a blog post (http://emergencymedic.blogspot.com/2011/09/sever-sepsis-talk-by-emmanuel-rivers.html) featuring Part 1 of this talk and a link back to EMCrit, encouraging my readers to subscribe to your RSS feeds.

Severe Sepsis by Dr. Emmanuel Rivers Part II

[…] If you haven’t already, check out Part I. […]

Severe Sepsis by Dr. Emmanuel Rivers Part III

[…] you haven’t already, check out Part I and Part […]

Part III of the Emmanuel Rivers Sepsis Talk is now published « The Central Line

[…] you haven’t already, check out Part I and Part […]

Guest

Jean-Francois Shields

Hi, this was a great lecture. I had some reserve tough about antibiotics in prehospital care. How would we be able to step down antibiotics when we don’t have a positive culture? Will it increase antibiotic resistance which is already a big problem? For what benefice?

Jeff

Author

Scott Weingart

It would have to be in community acquired infections only, that would be an easy screen. And with the new lit just published a few months ago in crit care med, it probably should only be in hypotensive patients. In this group there could be a fairly impressive mortality drop if abx were given 1 hr earlier.

Guest

Mike Christiansen

Hi Scott, Jeff and other listeners / readers.

I am a Paramedic Intern with Wellington Free Ambulance. Our current Clinical Patrice Guidelines have a Pre-hospital septic shock protocol for the patient population Scott mentions above. See p60 – 61 of http://www.ambo.com.au/download/wfa_guidelines_2011.pdf

Great lecture series, and Podcast Scott and contributors, Im a big fan of your work!

Regards,

Mike

Comments on the Rivers' Sepsis Podcasts

[…] emcrit on October 2, 2011 Adam Drenzla wrote these excellent comments after listening to the Rivers’ Podcasts. Adam’s comments are in gray, my replies are in […]

The LITFL Review 034

[…] of the Week!EMCrit Top spot this week is taken out by EMCrit with a brilliant podcast featuring Dr. Rivers on Severe Sepsis – Part I. Scott put a call out to his EMCrit followers a couple of weeks ago asking what they wanted […]

Click on this link now!

[…] environment?Regardless, of where you look after critically ill patients you MUST click on this LINK now!What will you find there?Two things:The first part of a talk by ‘Early Goal Directed […]

Best Of The LITFL Review 2011 - Life in the Fast Lane Medical Blog

[…] […]

Sepsis | Welcome to Jeremy Jaramillo's Blog

[…] Part I […]

Rivers Trial- Early Goal Directed Therapy. | Critical Care Practitioner