NEJM recently published an interesting review article on upper airway obstruction. This podcast was spurred by a rantorial on twitter by Farkas regarding the article:
this fresh review article in NEJM on acute upper airway obstruction is the most horrifically wrong & dangerous piece of literature I've encountered in a while 😳 (#rantorial 1/6)https://t.co/sDCY53cWkn pic.twitter.com/2FdCly2b0C
— 𝙟𝙤𝙨𝙝 𝙛𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙖𝙨 (he/him) 💊 (@PulmCrit) November 14, 2019
I took a look–and it was indeed bad…
Here is the Article:
Eskander et al. Acute Upper Airway Obstruction
Some Additional References
Here is the review article on which some of the flawed messages of the NEJM piece are based:
- Cricothyrotomy versus Trachetomy: An Otolaryngologist's Perspective. Laryngoscope. 1988 Feb;98(2):131-5.
These two pieces from the ENT and OMFS literature correct these errors:
- Cricothyrotomy: When, Why and Why Not: Am J Otolaryng 2000;21(3):195
- Elective Surgical Cricothyroidotomy in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Br J Oral Max Surg 2013;51:779
Updates:
- Best Practices for Emerg Surg Airway (Laryng Invest Otolaryng 2019;4:602)
Additional New Information
More on EMCrit
Additional Resources
You Need an EMCrit Membership to see this content. Login here if you already have one.
I’m glad to see others had the same reaction I did. The myth of needing to urgently convert crics to trachs seems impossible to slay, among others.