• Home
  • EMCrit-RACC
  • PulmCrit
  • EMNerd
  • Tox & Hound
  • iSepsis
  • About
    • About EMCrit
    • About PulmCrit
    • EMCrit FAQ
    • Subscription Options
  • Contact Us

EMCrit RACC

Online Medical Education on Emergency Department (ED) Critical Care, Trauma, and Resuscitation

  • Airway
  • Archives
You are here: Home / EMCrit-RACC / EMCrit RACC Podcast 216 – The Hemodynamically Neutral Intubation

EMCrit RACC Podcast 216 – The Hemodynamically Neutral Intubation

January 22, 2018 by Scott Weingart 25 Comments

 

 

 

 

In Podcast 104, we discussed how to avoid killing hemodynamically unstable patients while intubating. Today's podcast takes that concept a step further to allow you achieve a hemodynamically neutral intubation.

The Pieces

Rapid Sequence Awake

Discussed in this podcast

or

Dissociated “Awake” Intubation

or

A Combination

then

you can consider a DSI for Hemodynamics, but only in non-tenuous patients

then

place the patients on CPAP/PSV mode with both set to zero

if the patient requires mechanical ventilatory support because they continue to decline, consider

Higher Vt/Lower Rate as per Davis et al.

and

Sedate with small hits of ketamine or fentanyl

Further Reading

  • Pulmonary Hypertension Awake Intubation from CCM

Now on to the Podcast…

http://media.blubrry.com/emcrit/p/traffic.libsyn.com/emcrit/EMCrit-Podcast-20180121-216-Hemodynamically-Neutral-Intubation.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (21.6MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | Google Play | RSS | More

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Scott Weingart

An ED Intensivist from NY.

Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)

  • EMCrit RACC Podcast 222 / EDECMO Podcast – Demetris Yannopoulos on ECPR-the Minneapolis Way - April 8, 2018
  • EMCrit RACC Wee – Debate re: Idarucizumab with @First10em - April 5, 2018
  • EMCrit RACC Podcast 221 – Burns Part II with Dennis Djogovic – Airway, Lungs, Tubes and Stuff - April 2, 2018

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: EMCrit-RACC Tagged With: featured, LAMW

Cite this post as:

Scott Weingart. EMCrit RACC Podcast 216 – The Hemodynamically Neutral Intubation. EMCrit Blog. Published on January 22, 2018. Accessed on April 22nd 2018. Available at [https://emcrit.org/racc/hemodynamically-neutral-intubation/ ].

Financial Disclosures

Unless otherwise noted at the top of the post, the speaker(s) and related parties have no relevant financial disclosures.

You finished the 'cast,
Now get CME credit

Already an EMCrit CME Subscriber?
Click Here to Get CME Credit for the Episode


Not a subcriber yet? Why the heck not?
By subscribing, you can...

  • Get CME hours
  • Support the show
  • Write it off on your taxes or get reimbursed by your department

Sign Up Today!

.

Subscribe Now

If you enjoyed this post, you will almost certainly enjoy our others. Subscribe to our email list to keep informed on all of the Resuscitation and Critical Care goodness.

This Post was by the EMCrit Crew, published 3 months ago. We never spam; we hate spammers! Spammers probably work for the Joint Commission.

Comment Here

25 Comments on "EMCrit RACC Podcast 216 – The Hemodynamically Neutral Intubation"

avatar
Role
avatar
Role
newest oldest most voted
Floyd Miracle
Guest
Floyd Miracle
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Dr. Weingart, can you explain how CPAP and PS at Zero does anything? Does the ventilator provide any support?

What's Your Job?
Paramedic
Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Ben C
Guest
Ben C
Share On TwitterShare On Google

With the PEEP & PS at 0, the vent would do exactly nothing, which is actually one of the big points in (an expert level player) using the approach described. As he explained in the beginning the 3 causes of peri-intubation hypotension are: vasodilatory effects of sedatives, loss of sympathetic drive with sedatives, and conversion to positive pressure ventilation, and this approach is designed to avoid them all to the degree possible.

Any degree to which the ventilator supports the pt is positive pressure ventilation (whether a little w/ something like PEEP 0, PS 5 or a lot w/ something like PEEP 10, PS 10), and will cause a loss of venous return/decrease in BP.

Sounds really strange to have a ventilator doing nothing (except preventing apnea since a backup rate should kick in if the pt went apneic) w/ an intubated pt, but I’d speculate that it’s this doing very weird things for very good reasons that adds the “expert level players only” in addition to the “bleeding edge” which is there since this is not evidence based (and probably never will be…can’t exactly do an RCT w/ pts in extremis).

What's Your Job?
Critical Care Paramedic
Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Floyd Miracle
Guest
Floyd Miracle
Share On TwitterShare On Google

I understand WHY, I’m wondering what if anything the vent does. With Zero pressure support and PEEP, what does the ventilator do, if anything? Does it just open the valves to allow the flow of gas?

What's Your Job?
Paramedic
Vote Up-1Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Ben C
Guest
Ben C
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Gotcha. Yeah, it should just open the circuit (I’m sure there would be specifics for each particular vent that reps/RT’s might know). You could, of course, still control FiO2, and it would calculate VTe, minute ventilation, etc as normal with alarms/back up rates in the case of hypoventilation or apnea depending on the ventilator’s backup settings and your alarm settings. I’m sure it would still have all the same indicators of pt effort, too (familiar w/ LTV1200 which has a pt effort light, I know some hospital vents show that with different colors of waveform).

I’m not an expert at vents or anything, but hopefully that does better to answer your question.

What's Your Job?
Critical Care Paramedic
Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Brandon O
Guest
Brandon O
Share On TwitterShare On Google

I am not so sure this is correct. Setting a pressure support of 0 implies that a pressure of zero will be maintained in the airway circuit. Spontaneous breathing is performed by generating a negative pressure, not a zero pressure. That makes me think that a PS of 0 would actually be offering just enough pressure to “counter” the negative inspiratory force. It’s less impactful than having a positive pressure >0, but more than being open to air with something like T-piece.

What's Your Job?
Critical Care PA
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

that is not how Press Support Works.

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Brandon O
Guest
Brandon O
Share On TwitterShare On Google
I could be wrong; tell me how! I think it is a common misperception that pressure modes on the vent (or even on a non-invasive device, other than very simple ones such as those sometimes used by EMS) generate some sort of fixed pressure head at the inlet. But in my understanding this is wrong, because the actual pressure created in the airway would then be arbitrary. In reality, pressure modes adjust the flow rate until the pressure within in the circuit reaches the target pressure, then hold it for the set inspiratory time (or in pressure support, hold it until the patient-generated flow drops to a certain level). How much work — i.e. how much flow — the vent has to do to generate that pressure depends wholly on compliance, i.e. on both physical factors (chest wall compliance, lung recruitment) and on patient effort (the more spontaneous work they do, the more negative inspiratory force they generate, so the more flow the vent has to offer in order to maintain a POSITIVE pressure in the circuit). An example of a system with a true fixed pressure head would be high-flow nasal cannula. While this device does generate both inspiratory… Read more »
What's Your Job?
Critical Care PA
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Well the main way is regarding a setting of zero on PS. If you set it to zero, the system doesn’t attempt to maintain a Paw of zero, it actually deactivates PSV. A vent set to PSV 0 and CPAP 5 becomes a pure CPAP mode–there is no alteration of what happens during the insp. phase through PSV.

As to the rest of your description of PSV, yes–accurate, but non-germane. Not sure what any of that has to do with the ? at hand. Discussion was what happens when you set PS to 0.

Perhaps to reinforce this, a setting of PS 0 and CPAP 0 is essentially a t-piece trial, if we discount any resistance imposed by the circuit, which should be minimal on a good modern, ICU vent. This is why t-piece trials have always seemed ridiculous. Why wouldn’t you want the back-up ventilation and the ability to monitor minute ventilation. I believe it is a remnant of a time when the circuit resistance was abhorrent–the valves on the old Birds were miserable to breathe through.

What's Your Job?
EMCritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Brandon O
Guest
Brandon O
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Just trying to make sure we’re on the same page. I guess the crucial question is how the vent behaves specifically with a PS and a PEEP both set to zero. I agree that there is utility to a mode that actually “opens” the circuit and turns it into a virtual T-piece, but that would be a qualitative difference in behavior compared to how PS works in all other situations — in other words, changing the PS from 2 to 1 would mean something very different from changing it from 1 to 0.

And it may be. If you’ve looked into this then I believe you. It also wouldn’t surprise me if this behavior differed by model and manufacturer; maybe I’ll ask our rep. I hardly ever have a need to dial down to zero, but it does seem like this could easily be answered by experimenting with a vent and a friendly subject (and perhaps a manometer).

What's Your Job?
Critical Care PA
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Federico Carini
Guest
Federico Carini
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Great great episode, Already commented on Twitter but I guess it is better to do it here.
Some topics that I would like to clarify:
– Remifentanil for sedation… I know you dont have it, but here in Argentina we do use it a lot.
– Impact of ket on very elderly / fragile folks, is it really so dangerous?
– Risk of adrenal supression with etomidate, real impact?
– In case I use a push dose pressor, what would be your choice and in which dose?
Again, congrats on a great work!
Best
Fede

What's Your Job?
Critical Care specialist
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

no impact (neg impact) on anyone if they are hypotensive, when using doses I describe
etomidate’s adrenal suppression has not shown pt important outcomes, but i see very little use for this drug.
see the push-dose pressor update episode

What's Your Job?
EMCritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Petros Kopterides
Guest
Petros Kopterides
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Great stuff, Scott.
I am sceptical about the point you make around 18:40-1855, if you are talking about patients with massive PE. These folks have high pco2 (because they have high dead space) and resp acidosis will make their pulmonary hypertension worse if you pay no attention to the pco2 with you mechanical ventilation strategy

What's Your Job?
MD
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Petros,
If you parse your comments you will see they are self-contradictory

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Dave
Guest
Dave
Share On TwitterShare On Google
As always, fantastic post. I had a comment in general to a somewhat common theme in your podcasts when you talk about an “evidence-free zone” or are talking about “studies” on a particular intervention without direct conduct in an RCT. You’ve said before “I don’t want to do the trial unless no one else will” and something *loosely* to the effect of “I’d rather evaluate someone else’s trial and make my own judgement on how to adapt my practice”. In fact, in one of your episodes you openly responded to critiques from a Letter to the Editor about one of the studies you conducted, noting that you had to work with what you had. As someone in clinical development (my real day job), I don’t think the average clinician or practitioner knows just how hard it is to actually conduct a clinical trial – whether of registrational (label-enabling) and extreme rigorous conduct of quality the FDA requires, or trying to reconstitute actual clinical practice and still not have 10^4 variables flying around. I’d love – and it may actually be a great teaching point for the young ones – to use a topic or procedure such as this here as… Read more »
What's Your Job?
EMT (PhD)
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Dave,
I think you will be very happy with the KeyLIME podcast from the ICE folks.

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Chris D
Guest
Chris D
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Anyone using IV scopolamine as a sedative for these types of intubations? I’ve also seen some of my mentors trial their push dose pressers before intubating. On patients who are on the borderline and not on pressors yet we’ll give a 100mcg of phenylephrine — if it works ,great, if not, we’ll prepare another press or infusion and have it running before the intubation.

What's Your Job?
EM critical care Physician Assistant
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

mentioned during the original hemodynamic kills podcast

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Anandan
Guest
Anandan
Share On TwitterShare On Google

An interesting post about a very common but least discussed issue. My query is how do u use ketamine even in the low dose that u describe in a patient whose heart rate is already around 150 beats / min. I have precipitated arrhythmias in a few patients. I use fentanyl alone along with topical lido.

What is the blood pressure or another marker based on which u switch in r initial ventilation settings

What's Your Job?
Resident in Nephrology
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
trackback
LITFL Review 316 | Edwin M. Thames
Share On TwitterShare On Google

[…] Weingart walks listeners through the hemodynamically neutral intubation. Don’t give meds and higher doses of meds that would drop the BP, take away sympathetic drive, […]

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Sylvia Boys
Guest
Sylvia Boys
Share On TwitterShare On Google

HI Scott
I’d not intubate the crashing PE ( Even the presumptive crashing PE), with RV dilation on bedside scan – I’d push tenecteplase, yes the next 2-3 minutes are a little tense – especially convincing , junior’s to wait, but generally their saturations and BP improve after that.. Likewise with a tamponade, they don’t need an airway, they need the tamponade drained, and if too unstable to go to the lab then that’s done in the resus room.
However for severe crashing sepsis this is a useful approach

What's Your Job?
FACEM
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Daniel
Guest
Daniel
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Thanks for the podcast Scott, intriguing topic.

Lignocaine topicalisation of the airway is very effective for removing the gag/cough reflex to an ETT in-situ. We do it all the time for awake fibre-optic intubation. But I don’t believe having insensate mucous membranes around the larynx/pharynx will ablate the sympathetic response to laryngoscopy. The difference being that laryngoscopy causes subluxation of the mandible and significant pressure on the hyo-epiglottic ligament. Just like the mandibular movement from an aggressive jaw thrust is stimulating enough to wake up a sedated patient, even though there is nothing in their pharynx/larynx.

It may be possible with the two person technique, as you previously described in the “triple setup”. But maybe avoid advancing the tip of the videolayngoscope as far as the vallecula, but just raise the back of the tongue enough to get a view of the epiglottis and allow passage of your flexible bronchoscope. Thus avoiding the stimulation of a proper laryngscopy.

What's Your Job?
Anaesthetics/Emergency
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Daniel–I’m not sure I understand your intent. This is a post on hypotensive/shocked patients,why would you want to avoid sympathetic stimulation?

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
tom fiero
Guest
tom fiero
Share On TwitterShare On Google

extraordinary, scott.
thank you

What's Your Job?
ed doc, merced ca.
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 months ago
Michael Perlmutter
Guest
Michael Perlmutter
Share On TwitterShare On Google

You’ve mentioned dexmedetomidine in previous airway lectures. Would you consider that to provide patient comfort once the tube is in, +/- additional topicalization down the bronch? I wonder if this would avoid any potential hypotension issues associated with opiates, although I think highly of Dutton’s fentanyl-based approach.

What's Your Job?
Medical student, critical care paramedic
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
30 days ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart
Share On TwitterShare On Google

i still like ketamine initially. once you stabilize them then give them what you want–and that is the goal-fix the reason for the hypotension

What's Your Job?
emcritter
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
27 days ago

Follow EMCrit Everywhere

Click for More Subscribe Options


Other Stuff

  • Have a great idea for the next podcast? Share it here!
  • Tough Questions. Maybe you have an answer!
  • When you're done listening to the podcast,
    check out these great sites.

Who We Are

We are the EMCrit Project, a team of independent medical bloggers and podcasters joined together by our common love of cutting-edge care, iconoclastic ramblings, and FOAM.

Like Us on Facebook

Like Us on Facebook

Subscribe by Email

EMCrit is a trademark of Metasin LLC. Copyright 2009-. This site represents our opinions only. See here for full disclaimer and here for credits and attribution.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.