intro: the challenge of procedural sedation in critical illness
Procedural sedation for critically ill patients is a minefield for several reasons:
- Patients are already physiologically unstable.
- Procedures are emergent (a factor widely associated with greater complications).
- Time constraints often prevent a complete pre-anesthetic evaluation (e.g., medical history and laboratory studies may be unknown).
- A single operator may be required to perform the procedure and simultaneously administer anesthesia.
- End tidal CO2 monitoring is often unavailable or impossible (e.g., due to the use of high-flow nasal cannula).
To overcome these challenges, different sedation strategies are required. For example, propofol sedation is terrific when meticulously applied to stable patients in a controlled setting. However, propofol administration in the context of a critically ill patient with cardiopulmonary instability can easily go sideways.
The safest sedation strategy will be built upon the safest component medications. When considering medications that provide hemodynamic stability with little respiratory suppression, three are notable: ketamine, benzodiazepines, and butyrophenones (haloperidol and droperidol). Among benzodiazepines, midazolam is generally most desirable based on its rapid onset and short half-life (yeah, remimazolam would probably be superior but it's not widely available). So, this leaves us with ketamine, midazolam, and haloperidol/droperidol. Midazolam and ketamine work really well together and have a long track record for procedural sedation – so they're the basis of the MidaKet strategy.
Without further ado, let's describe exactly what we're talking about:
definition of the MidaKet sedoanalgesia strategy
MidaKet refers specifically to the following strategy:
(Phase #1) Titrate midazolam to achieve moderate sedation:
- Start with a ~3-5 mg IV bolus.
- Administer additional doses of 2 mg IV q2-4 minutes.
- Titrate until the patient is sleeping and doesn't fully wake up following stimulation (although this target level of sedation will vary depending on the procedure and requires expert judgement).
- The cumulative dose required is typically ~0.1 mg/kg but may range between ~0.05 – 0.15 mg/kg (~5-10 mg).
(Phase #2) Add ketamine to deepen sedation:
- Start with ~50 mg IV ketamine.
- If needed, provide additional ~25-50 mg IV ketamine q2 minutes.
- Titrate to achieve the appropriate depth of sedation for the procedure.
- The cumulative dose required is often ~50-100 mg.
(Phase #3) Maintain adequate sedoanalgesia during the procedure:
- If the patient arouses during the procedure, administer additional doses of ketamine (25-50 mg q2 minutes PRN). Ketamine is the backbone of sedation maintenance, because it has a very rapid onset with no real risk of overdose.
- The addition of small doses of midazolam may occasionally be useful for longer procedures (to prevent midazolam from wearing off). For example, 1-2 mg of midazolam could be given q5 minutes PRN if there is difficulty maintaining adequate sedation.
Midazolam titration needs to be more gradual to avoid dose stacking. Patient sensitivity to midazolam is unpredictable, so dose-titration is an exercise in empiricism. Usually only a few doses are required, so this phase isn't too long. Subsequently, ketamine doses can be given more rapidly because ketamine has a fast onset and there is less concern regarding overdosing on ketamine (you can't “over-dissociate” the patient). Overall, both phases #1-2 can usually be accomplished in a reasonably short time period (<10 minutes). Giving the initial doses of midazolam early (while you're setting up your equipment) can avoid long delays while waiting to achieve an adequate level of sedation.
examples of where MidaKet may be useful
MidaKet may be useful for nonintubated patients undergoing significantly uncomfortable procedures. (For intubated patients, there is a very broad range of safe sedation strategies, so sedation usually isn't very challenging.)
Some examples include:
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy.
- Chest tube insertion.
- Cardioversion in midazolam-resistant patients (deep midazolam sedation alone is sufficient for most patients, as discussed further here: 📖).
- (Note: for bronchoscopy, midazolam/fentanyl is probably superior due to reduced risk of laryngospasm and superior suppression of cough. However, midazolam-ketamine has been used successfully for bronchoscopy.) (24976998)
rationale for MidaKet
Midazolam and ketamine work well together:
- Midazolam may reduce several problems encountered with ketamine:
- Midazolam prevents psychomimetic side effects of ketamine (e.g., agitation). (30611640)
- Midazolam's antiemetic activity may reduce nausea/vomiting due to ketamine. (24825990)
- Midazolam may counteract hypertension, hypersalivation, and increased excitatory effects of ketamine (tremors, involuntary movements, muscle contractions). (24825990, 15497296, 14569435)
- Ketamine can be used to treat paradoxical agitation from midazolam. 🌊
- Midazolam and ketamine have additive sedative effects (enhancement of the GABA neurotransmitters and inhibition of NMDA neurotransmitters facilitates balanced and potent sedation). (15497296, 8267198)
Advantages of MidaKet as compared to midazolam monotherapy:
- Ketamine adds analgesia.
- Ketamine allows for achievement of a deeper plane of anesthesia (full dissociation).
- Ketamine can be redosed rapidly in a safe fashion (because ketamine takes effect rapidly and there is a reduced risk of overdose given the flat shape of ketamine's dose-response curve). This allows for achievement of target sedation promptly. In contrast, midazolam doses need to be spaced out farther in order to avoid dose stacking – so using midazolam monotherapy may take longer to reach the target level of sedation. The ability to redose ketamine rapidly and safely is especially useful if sedation starts wearing off during a procedure.
Advantages of MidaKet as compared to ketamine monotherapy include:
- Midazolam reduces the rate of numerous side effects from ketamine, as discussed above (especially agitation during both induction and reemergence).
- Midazolam achieves rapid anterograde amnesia (if the patient has some disturbing dreams due to the ketamine, these won't be remembered).
- Midazolam synergy allows for lower doses of ketamine to be utilized (e.g., often ~50-75 mg rather than ~150-200 mg). (15497296, 8267198) The use of lower ketamine doses may decrease the rate of ketamine-related side effects (e.g., emesis, prolonged recovery period).
- Midazolam synergy with ketamine avoids problems with ketamine refractoriness (discussed in detail here).
Advantages of MidaKet as compared to midazolam plus fentanyl:
- MidaKet may be used to achieve a deeper plane of anesthesia, if desired (e.g., full dissociation).
- Ketamine doesn't suppress the respiratory drive (whereas fentanyl does). Studies comparing midazolam/ketamine versus midazolam/fentanyl have demonstrated less desaturation with midazolam/ketamine. (22944555)
how MidaKet is different from many studies utilizing midazolam and ketamine
The combination of midazolam and ketamine isn't anything new. Studies have reported success using this combination dating back for decades. However, there are some features of MidaKet that may be especially useful:
[#1] Combined efficacy driven by midazolam and ketamine
Most studies combining midazolam and ketamine have used relatively small doses of midazolam (e.g., 0.02-0.05 mg/kg) combined with a large dissociative dose of ketamine (e.g., 2 mg/kg). In this scenario, the ketamine is doing most of the heavy lifting. A small dose of midazolam will help avoid reemergence agitation. So this strategy represents a minor improvement upon ketamine monotherapy.
MidaKet involves dose-titration of midazolam to achieve moderate sedation (with more substantial midazolam doses, often ~0.1 mg/kg), followed by moderate doses of ketamine (frequently ~0.5-1 mg/kg). The overall goal is balanced sedation that is a true hybrid of GABA receptor activation and NMDA receptor inhibition.
This balance is based on the concept of multimodal sedoanalgesia, wherein multiple agents are utilized at moderate doses to achieve high potency with minimal toxicity. Using lower doses of ketamine may avoid ketamine-related side effects.
[#2] Titration of midazolam and ketamine to effect
Most studies involving midazolam and ketamine have involved fixed medication doses. In some cases, the absolute dose of medication was fixed (e.g., 5 mg midazolam). More often, fixed weight-based doses were utilized (e.g., 0.1 mg/kg midazolam).
Individual patient sensitivity to midazolam and ketamine varies enormously, depending on factors such as age and alcoholism. It's impossible for any fixed dose of medication to be optimal for all comers. Consequently, any fixed-dose protocol will overdose some patients while underdosing other patients.
Dose titration does take a little extra time (although this can be minimized by starting to give doses of midazolam while finishing your procedural setup). However, clinical dose titration is quite simply the only way to achieve a uniform biological effect of the drug.
Skipping dose titration for ketamine is more justifiable than for midazolam. Ketamine has a flat dose-response curve, because it's impossible to over-dissociate someone. Therefore, giving a huge dose of ketamine is safe. However, using unnecessarily large doses of ketamine will increase side effects (e.g., vomiting). Thus, taking a few extra minutes to titrate the ketamine dose may pay off later when the patient wakes up promptly and comfortably. Since ketamine acts very rapidly, it can be given frequently to accelerate dose-titration.
- Midazolam and ketamine are both hemodynamically stable agents that cause relatively little respiratory suppression.
- A balanced combination of midazolam and ketamine may achieve synergistic sedation, while avoiding side effects that could result from higher doses of either agent.
- Slower initial dose titration with midazolam followed by rapid dose titration of ketamine allows for a safe, individualized, and prompt achievement of the desired level of sedoanalgesia.
- Compared to ketamine monotherapy, advantages of MidaKet may include reduced agitation, reduced emesis, superior anterograde amnesia, and superior patient satisfaction.
references
- 8267198 Hong W, Short TG, Hui TW. Hypnotic and anesthetic interactions between ketamine and midazolam in female patients. Anesthesiology. 1993 Dec;79(6):1227-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199312000-00013
- 10730829 Chudnofsky CR, Weber JE, Stoyanoff PJ, Colone PD, Wilkerson MD, Hallinen DL, Jaggi FM, Boczar ME, Perry MA. A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;7(3):228-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01064.x
- 14569435 Morse Z, Sano K, Kanri T. Decreased intraoral secretions during sedation-analgesia with propofol-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations. J Anesth. 2001;15(4):197-200. doi: 10.1007/s005400170002
- 15497296 Morse Z, Sano K, Kanri T. Effects of a midazolam-ketamine admixture in human volunteers. Anesth Prog. 2004;51(3):76-9. PMID: 15497296
- 20970888 Sener S, Eken C, Schultz CH, Serinken M, Ozsarac M. Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;57(2):109-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.010
- 21772684 Gündüz M, Sakalli S, Güneş Y, Kesiktaş E, Ozcengiz D, Işik G. Comparison of effects of ketamine, ketamine-dexmedetomidine and ketamine-midazolam on dressing changes of burn patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):220-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.81823
- 22258771 Uri O, Behrbalk E, Haim A, Kaufman E, Halpern P. Procedural sedation with propofol for painful orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department expedites patient management compared with a midazolam/ketamine regimen: a randomized prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2255-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01307
- 22944555 Cevik E, Bilgic S, Kilic E, Cinar O, Hasman H, Acar AY, Eroglu M. Comparison of ketamine-low-dose midozolam with midazolam-fentanyl for orthopedic emergencies: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.012
- 24825990 Somashekara SC, Govindadas D, Devashankaraiah G, Mahato R, Deepalaxmi S, Srinivas V, Murugesh JV, Devanand. Midazolam premedication in attenuating ketamine psychic sequelae. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2010 Sep;1(4):209-13. Epub 2010 Nov 15. PMID: 24825990
- 24976998 Dal T, Sazak H, Tunç M, Sahin S, Yılmaz A. A comparison of ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations used for sedation in the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a prospective, single-blind, randomized study. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):742-51. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.10
- 25913821 Gelen SA, Sarper N, Demirsoy U, Zengin E, Çakmak E. The Efficacy and Safety of Procedural Sedoanalgesia with Midazolam and Ketamine in Pediatric Hematology. Turk J Haematol. 2015 Dec;32(4):351-4. doi: 10.4274/tjh.2014.0149
- 25984547 Perumal DK, Adhimoolam M, Selvaraj N, Lazarus SP, Mohammed MA. Midazolam premedication for Ketamine-induced emergence phenomenon: A prospective observational study. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):89-93. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.155758
- 27676093 Akbulut UE, Saylan S, Sengu B, Akcali GE, Erturk E, Cakir M. A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000751
- 30611640 Akhlaghi N, Payandemehr P, Yaseri M, Akhlaghi AA, Abdolrazaghnejad A. Premedication With Midazolam or Haloperidol to Prevent Recovery Agitation in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation With Ketamine: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.016
- 33679936 Saylan S, Akbulut UE. A comparison of ketamine-midazolam combination and propofol-fentanyl combination on procedure comfort and recovery process in pediatric colonoscopy procedures. Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):483-488. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.2787
- 34427037 Tokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine and pethidine. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Oct;21(10):887-892. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14252
- 38600423 Sethupathy A, Gunasekaran V, Chelliah S, Pachamuthu M, Duraisamy S. Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Midazolam and Ketamine for Sedation During Invasive Procedures in Pediatric Hemato-Oncology. Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;91(6):639. doi: 10.1007/s12098-024-05128-8
- PulmCrit Wee – A better classification of heart failure (HFxEF-RVxEF) - August 26, 2024
- PulmCrit Wee: Rational selection of infusion rate based on loading dose - June 25, 2024
- PulmCrit: PPIs are safe and effective for GI prophylaxis… the end. - June 18, 2024
I like this approach. The one point I would add is consideration of an antisialagogue such as glycopyrolate to reduce secretions (and theoretically reduce the risk of laryngospasm from saliva aspiration)
I don’t think you really need an antisialogogue. One study found that the combination of midazolam and ketamine decreased salivation (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14569435/). Also and perhaps most importantly, decreasing the total dose of ketamine will reduce salivation.
When combining glycopyrrolate and ketamine I’ve encountered issues with tachycardia and hypertension, so overall I don’t think that glycopyrrolate would bring much to the table here.
I believe you are overstating things and that the evidence does not support your “take”. The studies support ketamine and midazolam being somewhat additive, but NOT synergistic. This one you cite (8267198) shows that at least for hypnotic effect (not responding to verbal) the equivalent doses necessary when ketamine and midazolam are combined are higher when added together than when either of them are used alone (0.15 mg/kg midazolam alone, 0.37 mg/kg ketamine alone, and when used together 0.086 mg/kg midaz with 0.27 mg/kg ketamine). And for achieving anesthesia (not responding to pain) adding midazolam to ketamine didn’t lower the… Read more »
Fair criticism, I changed the verbiage from “synergistic” to “additive” since a few folks have pointed this out. Based on the dose-response curves for ketamine and midazolam, even if the clinical effects are only additive then you can still use less medication when using a combination. Since dose-response curves have a flattened/sigmoidal shape, reducing the clinical effect by 50% will allow for a >50% reduction in the drug dose. This is basically just the fundamental concept of multimodal therapy – smaller doses of multiple medications. The key clinical issue is that midazolam tends to eliminate agitation in a partially dissociated… Read more »
Consider KetaDex! Conventional dosing of dexmedetomidine surpasses the attention span of most emergency docs (I’m interested in single-dose IM dexmed for agitation and in combination with ketamine for PSA, IM administration slows delivery and allows safe “bolus” dosing which might make it more useful in ED) but I’m surprised this hasn’t gained more popularity in ICUs. Lots of supportive data, including one study you cite (Gunduz 2011), which favorably compared KetaDex vs MidiKet. Dexmed has underappreciated analgesic qualities and unlike midaz is of course respiratory rate neutral. That said, ketamine and midazolam play very nice together, the amnestic effects of… Read more »