Screening for by cardiac injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma 73:(5) Supplement 4, S301-S306, 2012.
Michael McGonigal has a great summary of the BCI guidelines on his Trauma Professional's Blog
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 8:35 — 7.9MB) | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | Google Podcasts | RSS | More
Scott Weingart
An ED Intensivist from NY.
Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)
- EMCrit Wee – Semper Vitae – GRM with Helen Perry - July 20, 2019
- EMCrit 251 – Philosophical & Psychological Diversions Part II – Naive Reality and the Fundamental Attribution Error - July 16, 2019
- EMCrit 249 – You Can Either Learn or You Can Blame – Fixing the Morbidity and Mortality Conference with George Douros - June 13, 2019
Hey Scott-
At Level 2- they state:
“In patients with a normal ECG result and normal troponin I level, BCI is ruled out. The optimal timing of these measurements, however, has yet to be determined.”
I don’t know of any good evidence on how quickly trops rise after BCI but I suspect it takes some time as it does in MI to be reasonably sensitive. They acknowledge that the timing is “yet to be determined”.
Also Level 2: “The presence of a sternal fracture alone does not predict the presence of BCI and thus should not prompt monitoring in the setting of normal ECG result and troponin I level (moved from Level 3).”
Same problem; to me– based on the timing issue, one immediate NEG troponin doesn’t seem very helpful, and thus these recommendations using a negative troponin don’t appear to have much value.
I think it’s probably worthwhile to get since if it’s positive you can act on that– and an initial negative trop is probably a somewhat useful screen.
I definitely don’t wanna see a day where they are recommending a 2 set rule out for this!