Today, we discuss two new Trauma Guidelines
ATLS 9th Ed.
The 9th edition of ATLS has been published. In this episode, I review the changes from the 8th edition.
Management of C-Spine Injuries
We also go over the new management of spinal cord injuries from the Neurosurgeons
Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons
(Neurosurgery 2013;72(supplement 2):1-259 Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries)
What's EMCrit Drinking?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 11:37 — 10.7MB) | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | More
Editor-in-Chief, at EMCrit.org
An ED Intensivist from NY.
Professor
Chief, Division of Emergency Critical Care
Director, Resuscitation and Acute Critical Care Unit
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook, NY, USA
No conflicts of interest (coi).
Professor
Chief, Division of Emergency Critical Care
Director, Resuscitation and Acute Critical Care Unit
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook, NY, USA
No conflicts of interest (coi).
Latest posts by Scott Weingart, MD FCCM (see all)
- EMCrit 290 – Decompensated Hypothyroidism and Myxedema with Dr. Arti Bhan - January 23, 2021
- EMCrit 289 – Ketamine Only Intubation Paper with Brian Driver - January 12, 2021
- EMCrit 288 – Neurogenic Shock & Should we be Using Vasopressors for Hemorrhagic Shock? - December 29, 2020
Prevention of secondary injury in SCI is key. Many SCI are missed initially, and if you think they’re bleeding you *may* be tempted to not bump up their MAP to 90. If spinal shock, they should be bradycardic instead of tachycardic. And if spinal shock with no obvious bleeding, may not need blood products like you’ve mentioned in the podcast. I think you could give crystalloids and start pressors early, but this is if you suspect SCI and not hemorrhage.
[…] Scott Weingart’s podcast on the new ATLS guidelines and new spinal cord injury […]
just one point of terminology
spinal shock is not neurogenic shock, which is the correct trauma term in my opinion
spinal shock relates to loss of spinal cord reflexes in acute period of SCI, and these may recover with time.
Sorry. it isa pedantic point by one of my neurosurgical mentors.
[…] Also Mr EmCrit just posted a new podcast on his Practical Evidence blog on new ATLS guidelines on spinal cord injury. […]
Great ‘cast Scott. I (COI: ATLS instructor/course director) agree with your comments that ATLS is a foundation – we as specialists in our fields should certainly be aware of the more current directions…but equally aware of when current trends go awry!
Small correction: ETT cuff pressure should be less than 30 cmH20, not 30 mmHg (a little over 40cmH20). Fortunately, most pressure manometers are marked in cmH20 😉
Ross,
If you asked me clinically, I would absolutely agree with you. 30 cmH2O is our cuff cut-off and the the peds studies cited actually used 20 cm H2O.
However the podcast was based on this document:
http://web15.facs.org/atls_cr/help/9th_Edition_Compendium_for_Update_FINAL.pdf
on the American College of Surgeons website.
So either their summary is incorrect or their rec is high in both of our minds.
Can you take a cell phone shot of anything they have written with the values you mention.
Did they address therapeutic hypothermia (or relative hypothermia) in the acute sci guidelines?
Mary Shue
Emergency Department Pharmacist
University of Michigan Health System
not yet recommended
good point ROss. I did wonder about that mmHg reference too. OUr manometers read in cmH2O as well.
Just a technical glitch – the link for the c-spine update directs to the stroke guidelines. Can it be redirected?
(Neurosurgery 2013;72(supplement 2):1-259 Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries)
re: cuff pressure discussion. the units are a bear here. there are mmHg and mmH2O and cmH2O in regular use in medicine. the 9e FACS ATLS changes doc seems a bit off, as suggested. of the two citations they gave for the 30mmHg sentence quoted above: the first had no mention of appropriate cuff pressures (that i could find) and the second was a prospective trial that used and suggested pressures <= 20cmH20 (equivalent to about 15mmHg, very roughly 1.5x smaller. 1 mmHg = 13.6 mmH2O = 1.36 cmH2O). A quick glance at some random online lit confirms 20-30cmH20 is… Read more »
[…] Evidence Episode 12 – New Trauma Guidelines: ATLS & C-spine – Apr 13, […]