Ultrasound is a vital modality during cardiac arrest, but unless you have thought through exactly how you are going to use it, then it can be haphazard and potentially even harmful!
Today, we bring on Mike Prats of the Ultrasound Gel Podcast to discuss his Ultrasound Hierarchy of Needs in Cardiac Arrest.
Do no harm
Avoid Delays
Ultrasound is not the primary focus. Prioritize good care. Only one piece of information during the arrest.
Do not need every rhythm check!
Tips:
- Pre-pause imaging -in a pre/post protocol implementation it saved about 15 seconds
- Adjust clip time to 6 seconds or less, save only 1 clip
- Do not interpret in real time, get back on chest
- Person leading should not be doing ultrasound
- Use a real timer
- Most experienced sonographer if possible
- Consider TEE
- Protocol (such as CASA)
PLAX vs SUX?
Parasternal better quality and maybe slightly faster (but this was on ED patients NOT in arrest)
Diagnostic
Same as a non-arresting echo but even more focused
REASON data on pericardiocentesis → higher survival (15.4% vs 1.3% overall survival)
- Pericardial Effusion
- PE (RV dilation is tricky)
- Fine Vfib
- Maybe hypovolemia, hemorrhagic
- Pseudo-PEA
Could throw in pneumothorax and rest of RUSH if you want
Prognostic
REASON study was first good study
- Some patients without cardiac activity did get ROSC
Quantitative LV function in PEA (also from REASON data) – maybe it is a spectrum
Caution in variability of interpretation
*What is a good definition? REASON definition:
visible [coordinated] movement of the myocardium, excluding movement of blood within the cardiac chambers or isolated valve movement.
Pulse checks
The EMCrit Way: POCUS pulses–if you get one, have a team member palpating for a palpable pulse while you throw doppler over the artery:
Femoral Pulse Wave Doppler
Find the femoral artery
Put the gate in the center of the artery
PSV > 20 cm/sec is correlated with ROSC with SBP>60 mmHG [10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109695]
Tailoring resuscitation
TEE data for frequency of changing locations (53%), Teran 2019
Prehospital guiding compressions
Catena 2019 Resuscitation TEE LVOT Opening (100% of survivors had open LVOT vs 8% of nonsurvivors had open LVOT. 19 patients, retrospective)
More Information
More on EMCrit
You Need an EMCrit Membership to see this content. Login here if you already have one.
Professor
Nassau University Medical Center
No conflicts of interest (coi).
- EMCrit 385 – Eye Trauma I – Retrobulbar Hematoma, Orbital Compartment Syndrome, and Paracanthal Decompressions - October 5, 2024
- EMCrit Wee – Did this Really Just HAPPEN? – The HAPPEN Trial Hot Take – NIPPV for COPD - September 29, 2024
- EMCrit 384 – The Vascular Guy on Vascular Access - September 23, 2024
What are people’s trigger to stop chest compressions and perform a rhythm check? I ask this because blindly performing rhythm checks say every 2 minutes is the wrong thing to do and adds to the chest compression fraction. Also, some monitors are able to see the native rhythm through chest compression artifact. In regards to pulse checks, hopefully people aren’t blindly performing these either. At a minimum an organized rhythm should be in place. Thoughts? Concensus?