• Home
  • EMCrit-RACC
  • PulmCrit
  • IBCC
  • EMNerd
  • Tox & Hound
  • iSepsis
  • About
    • About EMCrit
    • About PulmCrit
    • EMCrit FAQ
    • Subscription Options
  • Contact Us

EMCrit RACC

Online Medical Education on Emergency Department (ED) Critical Care, Trauma, and Resuscitation

  • Airway
  • Archives
You are here: Home / EMCrit-RACC / Think You Understand Fluids–Cause I don’t have a grasp yet

Think You Understand Fluids–Cause I don’t have a grasp yet

November 29, 2013 by Scott Weingart 14 Comments

android-face

John (I think he wants to remain somewhat anonymous) is a clinically-retired, still actively teaching intensivist in India. He left the following comment on my Marik Response Post:

In the last 5 years or so, we have had a better understanding of capillary fluid dynamics, particularly in conjunction with an appreciation of the glycocalyx. We now know that the glycocalyx normally ‘traps’ about a litre and half of plasma water in it (due to its hydrophilic chemical composition!) and that normally in the capillaries, there is a central moving layer of plasma and a relatively immobile layer closer to the endothelium….the bit that is bound to the glycocalyx. This explains the differences in measured capillary and venous hematocrit values, and also why Crystalloid : Colloid equivalence is 1.3 : 1 rather than 4: 1 as previously thought.

We have also acquired a better understanding of the mechanisms of edema formation in critical illness and more importantly, the magical phenomenon of improved diuresis that we have all marvelled at, during the recovery phase.

In short, we have kinda debunked the original Starling theory of fluid dynamics in the capillary.

We now know that the colloid osmotic pressure in the intravascular space will only oppose the outward movement of water, and increasing the colloid osmotic pressure by synthetic colloids will not reverse the flow and draw fluid from the interstitial to the intravascular space. ( Multiple trials , starting with the SAFE trial have proved the futility of using synthetic colloids !) What they end up doing is, probably drawing water from the glycocalyx in the intravascular space itself and dehydrating and then disintegrating this vital layer. As a result you will find a transient improvement in blood pressures, but afterwards, a lot of this fluid will track into the extravascular space. Any hyperosmolar solution can do this including Soda Bicarb….we have all seen the very transient increase in blood pressure after bicarb which has always been incorrectly attributed to ‘reversal of acidosis’…bah!!

Extravasation of fluid from the capillaries is predominantly dependant on capillary hydrostatic pressure and not on decreased intravascular colloid osmotic pressure— because we have realised that interstitial and intravascular colloid osmotic pressures are very close to each other.

The way to prevent overloading and thus extravasation would be to minimise rapid increases in capillary hydrostatic pressure. How can we do that? – By small volume crystalloid boluses and early use of alpha1 agonists—the latter work by afferent arteriolar constriction and thus minimising huge increases in capillary hydrostaic pressures. This is where Marik’s argument takes a strong foothold.

Albumin is needed for the integrity of glycocalyx, — explaining why albumin is making a comeback into our fluid armamentarium.

The lymphatics have assumed a pivotal role in the normal mechanisms that prevent edema formation. We have realised that they are a very active conduit to return of interstitial fluid to the central circulation, and they they have contractile collecting ducts and passages that are calcium dependant. They are inhibited by the terrible twins ANP and BNP—therefore shutting down in active sepsis, where the twins tend to dominate. (This also partly explains the peripheral edema commonly seen with Ca channel blockers when they are used as antihypertensives). Once the sepsis resolves, ANP and BNP levels drop and the lymphatics recover their contractile elements. All the interstitial fluid can now be returned to the central circulation causing an improved diuresis.

In any case, fluids should only be used as any other drug should be— only if needed. We need to realise that fluid requirement and fluid responsiveness are two completely different things and focus on appropriate fluid balance rather than branding it as either restrictive or liberal.

What do you think? One question that I had is are we not doing the same thing with pressors if their true first action is to add to stressed venous volume?

photo credit
  • About
  • Latest Posts

Scott Weingart

An ED Intensivist from NY.

Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)

  • EMCrit Podcast 241 – Sepsis Update 2019 - February 21, 2019
  • EMCrit Podcast 240 – Renal Compartment Syndrome & It's all about the Venous Side and We've Been Fracking it up for Years - February 10, 2019
  • EMCrit 239 – Vent Alarms = Code Blue - January 26, 2019

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: EMCrit-RACC Tagged With: blogpost

Cite this post as:

Scott Weingart. Think You Understand Fluids–Cause I don’t have a grasp yet. EMCrit Blog. Published on November 29, 2013. Accessed on February 22nd 2019. Available at [https://emcrit.org/emcrit/best-fluids-comment-ever/ ].

Financial Disclosures

Unless otherwise noted at the top of the post, the speaker(s) and related parties have no relevant financial disclosures.

You finished the 'cast,
Now get CME credit

Already an EMCrit CME Subscriber?
Click Here to Get CME Credit for the Episode


Not a subcriber yet? Why the heck not?
By subscribing, you can...

  • Get CME hours
  • Support the show
  • Write it off on your taxes or get reimbursed by your department

Sign Up Today!


.

Subscribe Now

If you enjoyed this post, you will almost certainly enjoy our others. Subscribe to our email list to keep informed on all of the Resuscitation and Critical Care goodness.

This Post was by the EMCrit Crew, published 5 years ago. We never spam; we hate spammers! Spammers probably work for the Joint Commission.

14
Comment Here

avatar
Role
11 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Matt Anderson, UW CCM FellowJustin MemcritDr James FrenchRespect the glyocalyx, or at least know it exists - PulmCCM Recent comment authors
avatar
Role
newest oldest most voted
Casey
Guest
Casey

Awesome summary of the really dynamic and weird state of fluid homeostasis.
There is so much understanding we get from knowing how the glycocalyx works – seems to answer a lot of long held questions and matches with recent quality data on resuscitation.

To use a metaphor – Resus without understanding the glycocalyx is like being a gastro doc who doesn’t get the intestinal brush border function.

I think we will learn a lot about crit care down this path of research

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Erik Kistler
Guest
Erik Kistler

Nice description of what might be happening in septic patients. I think that we really don’t understand what’s going on in sepsis, and what is happening during one condition and at one time point and in a particular organ may not be occurring elsewhere. So blindly we go on… Regarding the glycocalyx – it appears to be of some importance – how much is unclear. Caveoli also may play a role with regards to endothelial permeability and like the glycocalyx their importance is unclear to me. I still think Starling forces are at play and whether the reflection coefficient is due to the glycocalyx or something else doesn’t matter to me. What one sees physically, when looking at the microcirculation in sepsis, is a whole lot of capillaries that are not being perfused. However, it’s very difficult to point to a particular event, such as a microthrombus and say “aha! That’s what occluded this capillary.” The endothelium tends to be more robust than the surrounding parenchymal tissue (at least in the mesentery/bowel) and if one looks at it using vital stains it can be demonstrated that the endothelium remains viable longer; the cells detach from one another and tend to… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Tom W.
Guest
Tom W.

Grasp this…
http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/108/3/384.full.pdf+html
Colloids don’t work in low capillary pressure states because Jv is close to zero and delta pi (oncotic pressure gradient opposing filtration) will be increased even by crystalloid resuscitation, added colloid is unnecessary. Hyperoncotic solution boluses suck water out of the glycocalyx if it isn’t already flat as a pancake and should not be given to hypovolaemic patients. Now lets talk about the J-curve and the J-point.
Declaration of interest… my son & I wrote it.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
thinkingcriticalcare
Guest
thinkingcriticalcare

Holy C^%#@%$#!!!!!!!

Back to the drawing board…awesome!

Always gotta be ready to re-examine your thinking!

Great post, Scott!

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
John
Guest
John

Fantastic article, Tom W……very nicely put indeed. Like I mentioned in our previous correspondence, the RSE&GM concept helps to very nicely put a lot of our clinical experiences in context. What people need to realise is that the cellular compartment, which is where life as we know happens, depends on extravasation of Oxygen and nutrients from the intravascular space into the interstitial space from where they get into the cellular compartment along electrochemical or physical gradients. In trying to chase an arbitrary MAP number, our desperate attempt to keep all the fluid in the intravascular space by perhaps synthetic colloids and other hyperoncotic stuff, will totally oppose this ‘normal extravascular shift’ which the system tries to preserve, even in states of low capillary hydrostatic pressure. (The concept of an osmotic pressure gradient building up in low pressure states, by movement of interstitial proteins back into the sub-glycocalyx cleft appears especially clever!) . It is this normal mechanism that we would upset, by jacking up intravascular colloid osmotic pressure with the use of hyperoncotic solutions….. The result would be that the mean arterial pressure would be excellent, but the cells would starve. Perhaps this accounts for some of the increased mortality… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
trackback
The LITFL Review 118 - LITFL

[…] EMCrit continues it’s mortgage on the ‘Ripper of the Week’ spot with Think You Understand Fluids–Cause I don’t have a grasp yet. The reason that this gets here is not because I love the glycocalyx (though I do — it is the […]

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Sarah
Guest
Sarah

Great article, thanks Scott!

Who says noradrenaline doesn’t clamp down on the lymphatic system as well? It does seem to make sense – to maintain any kind of prolonged fight/flight response we’d need to balance the increased intravascular pressure with lymphatic pressure so we don’t extravasate all our blood volume before the chase is over… Perhaps lymphatic pressure is the missing piece in the MAP puzzle. So then… antibiotics & noradrenalin as an empiric package for severe sepsis? Is anyone doing this?

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
trackback
The Glycocalyx: an overview for the clinician. #FOAMed, #FOAMcc | thinking critical care

[…] https://emcrit.org/blogpost/best-fluids-comment-ever/ […]

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
trackback
Respect the glyocalyx, or at least know it exists - PulmCCM

[…] New York Sepsis Collaborative, I started to dig a little…and whoa! And then of course, then now famous expose by John (Doe?) on EmCrit continued to convince me that this is definitely something I need to pay […]

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Dr James French
Guest
Dr James French

I just had a stroke reading this.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart

want some tPA?

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Justin M
Guest
Justin M

Positive pressure ventilation raises RAP, to some extent, and therefore MSFP (for a given cardiac output). How much does a change in MSFP impact upon capillary hydrostatic pressure? It may be insignificant but I can’t find anything about it.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Scott Weingart
Author
Scott Weingart

this paper should answer everything, good luck

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
5 years ago
Matt Anderson, UW CCM Fellow
Guest
Matt Anderson, UW CCM Fellow

link doesn’t work

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
4 years ago

Follow EMCrit Everywhere

Click for More Subscribe Options


Other Stuff

  • Have a great idea for the next podcast? Share it here!
  • Tough Questions. Maybe you have an answer!
  • When you're done listening to the podcast,
    check out these great sites.

Who We Are

We are the EMCrit Project, a team of independent medical bloggers and podcasters joined together by our common love of cutting-edge care, iconoclastic ramblings, and FOAM.

Like Us on Facebook

Like Us on Facebook

Subscribe by Email

EMCrit is a trademark of Metasin LLC. Copyright 2009-. This site represents our opinions only. See our full disclaimer, our privacy policy, and here for credits and attribution.

wpDiscuz
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.