So on the ISepsis section of the blog, Paul just posted on the uselessness of IVC ultrasound for fluid assessment. Now since I don't really believe in large volume repletion anymore, I don't really care about fluid responsiveness all that much either. But I never let a good opportunity for debate pass me by, so it was a delightful happenstance that one of the authors of a negative trial on IVC ultrasound for fluid responsiveness sent me an email a few weeks ago. It seems Dr. Keith Corl, who was lead author of a 2002 trial mentioned in Paul's post, did not let the matter go. He just published a repeated, and in his estimation, much better trial:
I'll be posting a wee about it and Paul's post very soon; EMNerd tells me he is working on one as well. In the meanwhile, why don't you read through the trial and tell us what you think in the comments section.
Latest posts by Scott Weingart (see all)
- EMCrit 251 – Philosophical & Psychological Diversions Part II – Naive Reality and the Fundamental Attribution Error - July 16, 2019
- EMCrit 249 – You Can Either Learn or You Can Blame – Fixing the Morbidity and Mortality Conference with George Douros - June 13, 2019
- EMCrit 248 – How to Teach Surgical Airways–you knows, Crics: The One-Hour Cricothyrotomy Course - June 4, 2019