Ocular
brace your hand on patient's nose. Fan through eye in transverse and sag
can see vitreous bleed
retinal detachment
icp-optic nerve sheath
lens dislocation
retro-orbital bleed
Key question, does the ocular anatomy look normal
More and more, it looks like 5.7 is the magic cutoff (Crit Care 2008;12:150)
If the optic nerve sheath is >5mm at a point 3 mm behind the globe, then there is
increased icp (ACAD EMERG MED d April 2003, Vol. 10, No. 4)







(2nd study Tayal VS Ann Emerg Med 2006)
Another study (Emerg Med J 2007;24:251)
Third Study (Annals of Emergency Medicine 2007;49(4):508-514)The sensitivity
for the ultrasonography in detecting elevated intracranial pressure was 100%
(95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 100%) and specificity was 63% (95% CI 50%
to 76%).
another ONSD uts study
case control methods and weird endpoint make this one less compelling, but
it bore out the technique
they used a 5.77 mm cutpoint
(Inten Care Med 2007;33:1704)
Confirmation with real ICP measurements ((2008) Academic Emergency Medicine
15 (2) , 201–204)
another real time showed nerve sheath but not nerve reflected ICP (Inten
Care Med 2008;34:2062)
Reply to Copetti and Cattarossi
Thomas Geeraerts1 , Olivier Bergès2,
Sybille Merceron1, Yoann Launey1, Dan Benhamou1,
Bernard Vigué1 and Jacques Duranteau1
| (1) |
AP-HP, Département
d’Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université
Paris-Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, 94275 Le
Kremlin-Bicêtre, France |
| (2) |
Service d’Imagerie Médicale, Unité
Ultrasons, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25 rue
Manin, 75019 Paris, France |
Accepted: 28 February 2009 Published
online: 15 April 2009
Without Abstract
This reply refers to the comment available at: doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1494-4
We thank Drs. Copetti and Cattarossi for their comments. We
however disagree with the assumption that our results [1,
2] are related to artifacts.
Using ocular sonography, the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
can be measured on coronal view (with the probe being vertical)
or on axial view (horizontal probe). On axial view, the optic
nerve sheath can appear fusiform, but not as a result of an
acoustic artifact arising from the lamina cribrosa, but rather
from unintended reconstruction when using an outdated ultrasound
system, or from a meningeal shadow when the nerve does not run
strictly straight. Blehar et al. [
3]
showed that measurements in the horizontal axis are consistently
larger than those in the vertical axis. This could be related to
a nonspherical ONSD, but also in some cases to this shadow. This
discrepancy could become an issue when performing only one
measurement in the horizontal axis, probably as Copetti and
Cattarossi did. In both of our studies, this point has been
considered. For each eye, we performed two measurements, one in
coronal and one in axial view, the average being retained as the
ONSD value. Nevertheless, to control this point, we performed an
additional analysis of our second study [
1].
We have now separated vertical and horizontal axis measurements
of ONSD. We found a similar and significant relationship between
intracranial pressure (ICP) and ONSD, with
r = 0.65 (
P < 0.0001)
for horizontal ONSD and
r = 0.71 (
P < 0.0001) for
vertical ONSD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves
for the detection of raised ICP (>20 mmHg) show very similar
patterns and best ONSD cutoff values for vertical, horizontal,
and both averaged ONSD (5.88, 5.86, and 5.86 mm, respectively)
(Fig.
1).
Fig. 1 Receiver operating
characteristic curves with respect to raised intracranial
pressure (>20 mmHg) for optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
measured in vertical and horizontal axis, and for averaged
horizontal and vertical axis. Curves are not significantly
different
Moreover, we also disagree with the assumption that magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and sonographic ONSD values strongly differ. We
recently performed a study in 38 traumatic brain injury patients with
invasive ICP monitoring, measuring ONSD with MRI [4].
Interestingly, we found a strong relationship between ICP and ONSD (r = 0.71,
P < 0.0001) and a best cutoff value for raised ICP (5.8 mm) very
close to the values obtained using ocular sonography.
We do not support the fact that color Doppler imaging of
retrobulbar arteries can help in the ONSD measurement. There is no
justification in the literature for this statement. Figure 2 is not
convincing. The left cursor (mark 1) is 1–2 mm too lateral, resulting in
a falsely enlarged ONSD. This could be related to the probe used by
Copetti and Cattarossi. The frequency of the probe has to be superior to
7.5 MHz for enough precision [5].
Such a probe was used in our studies, but not in Copetti and
Cattarossi’s work. Finally, ONSD values presented in their comments are
not in the correct units. ONSD are probably 5.9 and 3.5 mm rather than
59 and 35 mm.
We strongly believe that the method we applied is
appropriate. Data appear to be controlled, reproducible, and robust.
Larger studies are certainly needed to confirm the accuracy and
real-life feasibility of this method. This measure appears, however, to
be interesting to rule out raised ICP.


A new study showing accuracy at 5.2 and rapid normalization
when ICP is brought down (Neurocritical Care Dec 2009)
Results Ninety-four
ONSD measurements were analyzed. 5.2 mm proved to be the optimal
ONSD cut-off point to predict raised ICP (>20 mmHg) with 93.1%
sensitivity (95% CI: 77.2–99%) and 73.85% specificity (95% CI:
61.5–84%). ONSD–ICP correlation coefficient was 0.7042 (95% CI
for r = 0.5850–0.7936). The median interobserver ONSD difference
was 0.25 mm. CSF drainage to control elevated ICP caused a rapid
and significant reduction of ONSD (from 5.89 ± 0.61 to
5 ± 0.33 mm, P < 0.01).
Conclusion Our
investigation confirms the reliability of optic nerve ultrasound
as a non-invasive method to detect elevated ICP in intracranial
hemorrhage patients. ONSD measurements proved to have a good
reproducibility. ONSD changes almost concurrently with CSF
pressure variations.
Retinal Detachment
(Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:791 and Annals Emerg Med 2005;45(1):97)

ACEP News Article By Nate Teismann, M.D. , Sachita Shah, M.D. , and
Arun Nagdev, M.D.
Learning Objectives
After reading this article, the physician should be able to:
- Understand the normal ultrasound anatomy of the eye,
specifically the location of the retina.
- Know which probe is needed for ultrasound scans of the
eye, and the method to accurately and safely perform the
exam.
- Visualize an example of a retinal detachment diagnosed
by ultrasound.
|
|
Acute retinal detachment is a sight-threatening condition requiring urgent
diagnosis and treatment.
The most common type of retinal detachment (RD) is termed "rhegmatogenous"
(from the Greek rhegma, meaning "tear"), which refers to a break or tear
in the retinal epithelium. The majority of these cases result from age-related
vitreous detachment, which can create tiny, horseshoe-shaped holes that allow
fluid to pass into and accumulate in the subretinal space.1 In patients who are
younger, direct trauma is the most common etiology.2
Less common types of RD include "tractional," in which the vitreous contracts
and pulls the neural retina off the underlying pigmented layer but does not
cause a break in the epithelium, and "exudative," in which serous fluid
accumulates beneath the retina because of inflammatory conditions such as
sarcoid uveitis.3
Regardless of the cause, RD must be diagnosed and treated rapidly to prevent
monocular vision loss.
Traditionally, diagnosis of RD has relied on direct examination of the retina
using an ophthalmoscope. However, a number of factors may make this difficult or
impossible, including 1) contraindications to the use of mydriatics such as
narrow-angle glaucoma or the need to follow pupillary exams in a head-injured
patient; 2) significant periorbital trauma or soft tissue swelling; and 3)
inability to visualize the posterior segment of the eye because of hyphema, lens
opacification, or vitreous hemorrhage. In such cases, bedside ultrasound is
critical to the timely diagnosis of RD.
Already in use for decades by ophthalmologists, ocular ultrasound is a
relatively recent addition to emergency ultrasonography. Since 2002, a number of
studies have demonstrated that emergency physicians using general-purpose,
high-frequency transducers can accurately identify a variety of ocular
pathologies, including retinal detachment.4,5,6 Bedside ultrasound is an
indispensable tool for evaluating this potentially vision-threatening condition.
Procedure
Here is a simple mnemonic to help you with each CASE of potential
retinal detachment: 1) Close and cover the eye; 2) place the transducer
in the axial plane; 3) scan the retina; and 4) evaluate the
periphery.
1) Place the ultrasound machine at the head of the bed with the patient
supine. Ask the patient to close his or her eyes, and place a liberal amount of
gel over the eyelid. A bio-occlusive dressing may be used to shield the eye from
the gel.
2) Gently place the high-frequency linear (7.5-10 MHz) transducer over the
patient's closed eye. In order to obtain a stable image, the fourth and fifth
digits of the examiner's hand should rest against the bridge of the patient's
nose. The probe should be placed in a transverse orientation to scan in the
axial anatomic plane. The probe marker should face the patient's right side,
which will correspond to the marker on the ultrasound screen (see image 1).


3) Carefully scan the eye for evidence of pathology. The normal retina is
continuous with the other posterior elements of the globe and is not visible as
a distinct structure. With retinal detachment, fluid enters the potential space
beneath the retinal epithelium and accumulates, forcing the retina away from the
outer surface of the globe. Sonographically, retinal detachment is seen as a
thick, undulating, hyperechoic membrane that appears to have been lifted off the
posterior surface of the eye (see images 2A and 2B).


4) Make sure to evaluate the entire globe in order to avoid missing a small
RD at the periphery of the retina. Because the anterior-most attachment of the
retinal epithelium is just lateral to the ciliary bodies, care must be taken to
interrogate its entire surface. This may require asking the patient to gaze
upward and downward while tilting the transducer accordingly to achieve adequate
visualization.
Findings
In general, RD will appear as a prominent, continuous linear density rising
from the fundus. Depending on the timing and severity of the detachment, the
retinal separation may be visible only as a small peripheral convexity or, with
an extensive detachment, as a complex array of bright, intersecting lines (see
image 3A). Because the retina is fixed firmly to the optic disc, even a complete
detachment will often appear tethered to this point, giving a "funnel"
appearance (see image 3B).

Differentiation From Other Ocular Pathology
Other ocular processes may appear similar to RD on sonography, especially
posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and vitreous hemorrhage (VH). PVD may also
appear as a hyperechoic linear density that has been lifted off the posterior
globe; however, it typically appears as a thinner and smoother structure
compared to RD. VH typically appears as nonlayering, low-level echoes within the
vitreous body that are unattached to periphery of the globe (see image 4).


Because it can be difficult even for the expert ocular sonographer to
differentiate these diagnoses from RD, we recommend prompt follow-up in any case
with equivocal findings, especially when clinical features (e.g., photopsia)
suggest RD.
Other findings such as retinal breaks or tears--which, as already addressed,
are often the inciting event leading to RD--may be seen with ultrasound and are
visible as small, echodense tufts elevated off the fundus.8 Given their small
size, however, these structures typically require specialized ophthalmologic
transducers for visualization. Thus, we do not believe this diagnosis should be
considered within the scope of emergency sonography.
Discussion
Ocular ultrasound is emerging as a promising technique to diagnose RD.
Sonography is especially helpful in cases where an adequate eye exam is
impossible, or when the emergency physician does not have the luxury of time or
expertise to perform a thorough, dilated fundoscopic exam.
If RD is identified, the patient should be referred to an ophthalmologist on
an emergent basis, ideally within 24 hours. Because the sensitivity of this
technique in the hands of emergency physicians using general-purpose portable
ultrasound machines has yet to be determined, we recommend that any cases with
high-risk clinical features, such as the presence of flashes of light or vision
loss, also be referred on an urgent basis regardless of sonographic findings.
With this simple guide to ocular ultrasound, we hope more physicians will
learn and incorporate ultrasound into their evaluation of ocular complaints in
the emergency setting. We believe that ocular ultrasound is fast, safe, and easy
to teach and learn. We hope you will remember to pick up the ultrasound probe
for each CASE of potential retinal detachment you encounter.
References
-
D'Amico DJ. Clinical practice. Primary retinal detachment. N Engl J Med.
2008;359(22):2346-54.
-
Byer NE. Natural history of posterior vitreous detachment with early
management as the premier line of defense against retinal detachment.
Ophthalmology. 1994;101(9):1503-13; discussion 1513-4.
-
Gariano RF, Kim C. Evaluation and management of suspected retinal
detachment. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(7):1691-8.
-
Blaivas M, Theodoro D, Sierzenski PR. A study of bedside ocular
ultrasonography in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(8):
791-9.
-
Elia J, Borger R. Diagnosis of retinal detachment in the ED with
ultrasonography. J Emerg Med. 2008. (Article in Press) Available at:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547771
-
Winter K, Baker T. Images in emergency medicine. Retinal de-tachment.
Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(1):89, 95.
-
DiBernardo CW, Greenberg, EF. Ophthalmic Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas.
2nd ed. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
-
Lorenzo-Carrero J, Perez-Flores I, Cid-Galano M, et al. B-scan
ultrasonography to screen for retinaltears in acute symptomatic
age-related posterior vitreous detach-ment. Ophthalmology.
2009;116(1):94-9.
Home |
Disclaimer |
Contact |
Podcast