|
|
|
Huge potential for disagreement when assigning CPT-4 codes (Annals EM 40:3, 2002)
CC, ROS, PFSH may be separate or all in HPI. May be recorded by ancillary staff, but physician must write that they are reviewed and agreed with.
Must document on all charts
Need 4 Descriptive elements from following:
Also include associated signs and symptoms
Mention Mode of Arrival
History Exceptions
Unreliable Reporter
Language Limitations
Altered Mental Status
Can use caveat for history, but must document why and any other attempts to get history from other sources
Document all sources of information
EMS
NH
Previous Records
Private Physician
Family
And what you found or note you found nothing new
PFSH not required for Levels 1,2, 3
Must have one item from any of the three for level 4
Must have two of three for level 5 and Crit Care
Meds
Surgeries
ROS with positive responses should be documented, otherwise can right all other systems reviewed and negative
Level 2 or 3 requires 2 to 4 body areas or systems
4 requires 5-7 body systems or organs
Level 5 and Crit Care requires 8 organ systems (not body areas)
Con: VS noted, WDWN,
Psych: AOx3
Neck: Supple, No JVD
ENT: TMs Clear
Eyes: PERL, EOMI
Resp: Lungs CTA
CV: Heart S1S2
GI: Abdomen NT, NABS
Each notation can count towards only one system
Record all tests or at minimum the abnormals
Interpret the studies
List treatment options and response to treatments
Record consultations
Quality of diagnosis is more important than number of diagnoses
Dispo
Discussions with admitting team, consultants, specialists
Need two of three factors:
Must also document whether problem is improving, worsening, or same
Document oxygen admin and films to contribute to MDM
May simply initial a report containing the results
Must interpret not just review the labs/xrays
1 point each
2 points each
I performed a hist and phys exam of the patient and discussed his management with the resident. I reviewed the resident note and agree with the documented findings and plan of care
Use descriptive rather than definitive diagnoses
EKG interp must include 3 of 6
Rhythm/Rate
Axis
Intervals
St Seg Change
Comparison to Prior
Summary of clinical condition
Can also interp the monitor strip which should include rate and rhythm
Pulse ox: % o2, value, and assessment, ie. Good oxygenation
Unstable or patients requiring treatment or they will become unstable
Patients should be admitted, transferred, or expire
<30 min=E&M level >30 min=CCT
Time Spent:
Documenting
Interpreting Stuides
Consultation
Talking with patient and Family
Talking with EMS
Performing Bundled procedures
Review of tests/films, talking with consultants, eval and treatment, charting all count
Must write number of CCT minutes
Services Bundled in Crit Care Time
CO Output Interpretation
Chest X-rays
Blood Gases
Interpretation of data stored in computer
Gastric Intubation
Transcutaneous Pacing
Blood Draw
Pulse Ox
Vent Management
Family Psychotherapy
Time spent reviewing test results on the patient, discussing care with other
medical staff about the patient, documenting the medical record for the patient
and talking to the family (if the patient cannot give an adequate history due to
incompetence or inability to communicate) are all considered part of critical
care time. Time spent discussing emergency treatment options with family is also
considered as time in critical care including DNR status (regular updates and
emotional support do not count). Time supervising or teaching is not included
and delegated care of any kind is not included.
1) Interpretation of cardiac output measurements
2) Reading chest x-rays
3) Blood gases
4) Blood drawn for specimen (new this year)
5) Data retrieval
6) NGT
7) Pulse oximetry
8) Transcutaneous pacemaker
9) Ventilator management
10) Vascular access procedure
11) Family medical psychotherapy
Pt called, not in waiting room
Attempted to contact
Pt walked out without notice to ED staff
No one in waiting room knew patient
Triage nurse states pt appeared stable, without distress when evaluated
Pt seemed competent to understand
No relatives or friends were with pt
Called social services to attempt to contact

Moderate Sedation
Moderate (Conscious) Sedation
The moderate (conscious) sedation codes have undergone a dramatic revision that
affects emergency medicine significantly, particularly in the scenario where the
emergency physician is providing moderate sedation in support of another
specialist, such as an orthopedist or plastic surgeon.
The commonly used moderate sedation (formerly called conscious sedation) codes
99141 and 99142 have been deleted. In their place, there is a new set of codes
for moderate sedation that fall into two groups:
The same practitioner providing both the sedation and performing the procedure,
or
Two practitioners are involved with one practitioner supervising the sedation in
support of a second physician performing the procedure.
These two sets of codes are then further delineated based on the age of the
patient and the amount of time the service is provided.
Scenario 1 - Single provider
Codes 99143 (for patients younger than 5 years old) and 99144 (for patients 5
years or older) are used to report moderate sedation services when the same
physician is both overseeing the sedation and performing the procedure.
Both 99143 and 99144 are reported for the first 30 minutes of intra-service
time. Intra-service time refers to the time actually spent providing the service
as opposed to “pre-time,” preparing to start, or “post-time,” after the
procedure is complete. CPT defines moderate sedation time as starting with the
administration of the sedating drug, requiring continuous face-to-face
attendance, and ending at the conclusion of personal contact by the physician
providing the sedation. Recovery time cannot be counted as intra-service time.
Code 99145 is available to report additional 15 minute increments of time.
Scenario 2- In support of another provider
To report moderate sedation provided in support of a second physician who is
performing the procedure, 99148 is reported for children younger than 5 years
old, and 99149 is reported for patients 5 years and older.
99150 is available to report additional 15 minute increments of moderate
sedation that go beyond the 30 minutes ascribed to 99148 and 99149.
Keep in mind that in 2005, there was a new directive that bundled the work of
conscious sedation into many procedures. CPT created Appendix G that lists more
than 250 codes bundling conscious sedation including several that are relevant
to emergency medicine, such as the codes for chest tube insertion,
pericardiocentesis, insertion transvenous pacemaker, insertion pediatric central
line, insertion pediatric pic line, transcutaneous pacing, and elective
cardioversion.
In the scenario where the same physician is providing both moderate sedation
services and performing the procedure, it would not be appropriate to report
moderate sedation using codes 99143 and 99144 if the procedure is listed in
Appendix G.
However, it is recognized that there may be some circumstances in the emergency
department where the emergency physician is performing moderate sedation while
another physician performs a procedure on the patient. In this case, the
moderate sedation codes 99148 and 99149 may be reported even if the procedure is
listed in Appendix G.
ACEP represents the specialty of emergency medicine and was actively involved in
guiding these codes through the CPT and Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC)
processes.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2006 fee
schedule November 2005 and assigned no relative value unit (RVU) value to the
emergency department after-hours code or moderate sedation, meaning CMS will not
pay for either service. CMS did not assign any RVU value to the previous
after-hours and moderate sedation codes, either. However, CMS officials did
state in the Nov. 21, 2005 Federal Register, “We are uncertain whether the RUC
assigned values are appropriate and have carrier priced these codes in order to
gather information for utilization and proper pricing,” so a RVU from CMS could
occur in the future, which is good news for emergency medicine. Other payers
will make their own payment policies regarding special services codes and
moderate sedation.
Billing observation care is appropriate when the service provided exceeds that of the care provided for typical 99284 or 99285 cases. These are the patients with complex presentations or complex dispositions for which admission is a real possibility, but not a foregone conclusion. The use of time as a clinical tool is your key to understanding which patients these codes apply to.
CPT gives examples of admitted patients that are candidates for observation. I've included the following clinical scenarios as examples of possible observation care to which I've added some clarifying comments: chest pain (especially if you are running repeat enzymes and/or stress test), asthma (with a prolonged course of treatment), abdominal pain (for reassessments), renal calculi (if prolonged pain management), dehydration (if prolonged hydration and oral challenge documented), drug ingestions/overdose (classic six hour observation but not if obvious admission), or alcohol intoxication (likely these are ALOC for which time will tell you it was just the ETOH) or severe allergic reactions (for reassessments).
Time is not a clinical tool when (examples):
There are codes for when the patient's entire course occurs on one calendar day and other codes for when the course crosses over two calendar days. Medicare has a minimum requirement of an eight-hour stay for the one day course but no time requirement when observation continues past midnight. CPT has no minimum time frame, so ask your billing company what they use. The key for the provider to remember is that they must document the time when observation is started.
Observation is a "status," not a physical bed location. The physician invokes this when the order for observation is made. The hospital does not need to change the registration status of the emergency patient in order for physician observation to be paid. If you realize that reimbursement for observation services can be 40-80% higher than for emergency E&M levels, depending on the codes used, and that physician observation care does not require an observation services unit, you will find significant additional revenue in properly reporting observation care.
The minimum standard for what must be documented for observation adds these four elements to what would normally be written for an emergency patient. Most physicians find it easier to simply add an "Observation Note" at the end of their normal dictation style rather than trying to change styles of documenting.
| CPT | HPI | PE | MDM | 2008 RVU* Not adjusted for Budget Neutrality |
| 99284 | Detailed | Detailed | Moderate | 3.17 |
| 99285 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | High | 4.72 |
| 99217 | combined with 99219 or 99220 for diff/day DC | 1.85 | ||
| 99219 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Moderate | 2.89 |
| 99220 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | High | 4.06 |
| 99235 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Moderate | 4.63 |
| 99236 | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | High | 5.77 |
| 99291 | High | 5.90 | ||
Author: Andrea Brault, MD FAAEM MMM
President, Emergency Groups' Office
Home | Disclaimer | Contact | Podcast